Ohio Prospect Research Network
Established 1987 - Apra Ohio Chapter
The Ethics of Opt-Out Donation Increases - The Chronicle of Philanthropy
Laura and John Arnold Join the Latest Effort to Spur Giving by the Ultra-Rich - Inside Philanthropy
Charitable Crowdfunding: Who Gives, to What, and Why? - Lilly Family School of Philanthropy
Why Companies are Building Second HQs in Ohio - Fast Company
Covid-19 Wealth Impact: The World Ultra Wealth Report 2020
Diversity Is Not Enough in Fundraising Offices - The Chronicle of Philanthropy
Public Confused by the Term "Charity" - The NonProfit Times
Donor Relations and Fundraising Collide... For Good - Mark Lanum - We are for Good podcast
Celebrate Ohio's Women Philanthropists - Philanthropy Ohio
How to Jumpstart Diversifying an Organization's Donor Pool (Part 4) - Apra Connections
Furthering Your Nonprofit Career: 3 Tips for Development - Bloomerang
Strategies for Avoiding Tech Burnout - sgENGAGE Podcast
DAF Numbers Obscure Who's Giving and How Much - Inside Philanthropy
The Empty Chair/ La Silla Vacía - Armando Zumaya
Pandemic Prods Mortality in Millennials - The NonProfit Times
10 Books Every Nonprofit Leader Should Read - Joan Garry
Roundup of articles and podcasts on prospect development, fundraising, and philanthropy from last week. We’ll post a roundup each week.
How Do Households Make Giving Decisions?
What We Know About MacKenzie Scott's 2020 Grants
First Day Podcast - High Net Worth Donors and Under-Represented Communities
Networking for...What? by Jennifer Filla
3 Reasons to Explore Virtual Training for Non-Profit Staff
Are You Ready for a Fresh Start? Freakonomics Podcast
10 Must-Have Analytical Skills
Leading With Humanity by Lisa Greer (OPRN 2021 Conference Keynote Speaker)
Bill and Melinda Gates Aim to Spur More Individual Giving
Foundation and Corporate Research
by Beth Havens, Senior Prospect Researcher at Cincinnati Children's Hospital
Foundation and corporate research can be “easier” than individual prospect research in many ways. These funders, unlike individuals, usually state what they are interested in funding and tell prospective grantees how to apply.
Many foundations have websites with their giving interests detailed. They usually note if they accept applications, what the process is, and what types of organizations and projects they support. For those foundations that do not spell out their interests and processes, you may need to use one of several free or subscription-based databases that provide information on Request for Proposals (RFPs) issued by funders, grant histories (search by keyword, geography, recipients, year, etc.), or access to their 990s (list of directors, staff, and general process/deadline information).
For corporate research, again, the company website is the best place to start for general information on the business, locations, and the leadership/board. See the list below for some additional sources of corporate information. Keep in mind that private companies can be more difficult to research! To determine giving interests, look for Giving, Corporate or Social Responsibility, Community, Citizenship, or something similar. If the information isn’t obvious, do a search on their website for “Giving” or “Contribution” and review their News or Media pages for recent press releases about recent contributions or their recent Social Responsibility annual report. Some companies, in addition to a corporate giving program, have a corporate foundation with its own website that state guidelines, application processes, and deadlines.
Once you have found the information you need, be sure to document it in your database. Are you tracking philanthropic interests, giving to other organizations, application deadlines, key decision makers, and other key data points? Consider creating profile or summary templates similar to individual profiles that cover the information your gift officers need to know – what do they support, what is the process, and who, if anyone, in your organization is connected to them.
Below are some resources, both free and paid, that may help with your foundation and corporate research. One of your favorites not listed? Let us know in the comments!
Foundation Directory Online (Subscription). Check your public library. In Cincinnati, access to Foundation Directory Online Professional is available for use at the main branch.
Philanthropy News Digest RFP Bulletin Sign up for RFP email alerts or search RFPs by subject or keyword.
GuideStar (Free and Subscription). Search for organization’s 990.
ProPublica’s Nonprofit Explorer (Free). Search 990s by organization, people, or full-text.
Grant Forward (Subscription). Funding opportunities.
GrantStation (Subscription). Free RFP alerts.
The Chronicle of Philanthropy (Subscription includes access to GrantStation).
ProposalCENTRAL Science/research focused. Can review RFPs/opportunities for free.
Other science/research focused databases (subscription usually institution-based): PIVOT and SPIN.
Investopedia – Financial Term Dictionary
Corporate Research Project Older resource, but could be helpful in pointing you in the right direction, especially with public company and SEC filings.
Hoover's (Subscription). Corporate profiles.
Equilar (Subscription). Has a product targeted to Fundraising organizations.
Local business journals.
Local public library resources. Likely will need a library card and/or PIN.
Example of resources available online at the Public Library of Cincinnati and Hamilton County:
◊Magazine and newspapers articles
◊Cincinnati Business Courier (local business journal)
◊ReferenceUSA: database on US companies and US households
◊Magazine and newspapers articles
◊Cincinnati Business Courier (local business journal)
◊ReferenceUSA: database on US companies and US households
PrivCo (Subscription). Private companies.
BizStats Small business valuations. Look for Rule of Thumb ratios. There are books on business valuations and Rules of Thumb. Check your local library.
SIC Code Lookup (Standard Industrial Classification Codes).
Corporate Social Responsibility Newswire Check out the Philanthropy & Corporate Contributions section.
Ohio Secretary of State Business Search
US Securities and Exchange Commission Search
Your greatest career asset is often your knowledge capital! Taking stock in your strengths and weaknesses and developing both will help you and your future.
A great way to grow is to ask for a mentor or to become one yourself.
A mentor can help you with current projects and assignments, coach you through new areas of growth and share their field experience.
They can provide encouragement and be a sounding board for your ideas.
Knowledge is one of the most powerful tools you can possess, and one that is attainable by seeking new ways to learn. Having a mentor can help you establish goals for the near and the long term. The mentoring process can raise your awareness about the possibilities for your future.
Your mentor can be a great asset to career growth, but if you have experience, being a mentor is also a wonderful way to grow. Not only can you find satisfaction by helping others, but you learn by teaching. Building new relationships, helping others learn from your experience and sharing ways to help them problem solve are often extremely rewarding!.
Both mentors and those they mentor benefit in a variety of ways. Sharing ideas and experiences with each other will often result in increased confidence. As you progress, people will notice in interviews, time with your boss or with your staff. People will begin to notice a change, and eventually, those in your sphere will begin relate and perceive you in a different light.
To schedule mentoring time, you and your mentor/mentee can decide what works best for you after an initial meeting on the phone, through facetime or in person. The relationship you build together is to be built on mutual trust, respect and communication. It requires both parties to meet regularly to exchange ideas, discuss goals and celebrate progress. Even if you have an as-needed basis relationship, checking in with each other at set times to touch base is important.
OPRN has a great mentoring program that helps mentors and those who desire a mentor to connect. Many organizations will allow you to be mentored or to mentor someone in your industry on company time. Ask your supervisor what your organizational policy might be. If not, volunteering off the clock offers the same great rewards and mutual benefit.
If you'd like to find out more about becoming a mentor or connecting to one, visit the mentoring page on our website.
Taking the next step is up to you. It could be a great step to enhance your career!
In 2015 a photo of a dress went viral when viewers disagreed on whether the dress was black and blue or white and gold. The phenomenon showcased the difference in human color perception. Yes, a difference of perception. Views of the dress were not right or wrong, they simply had different perceptions. Sound familiar? Let’s put this in the perspective of development. A Prospect Development professional and a Development Officer have a meeting. The Prospect Development professional thinks a donor should be asked to support the cause with a $1,000,000.00 gift. But, the Development Officer thinks the same donor should be asked to make a gift of $500,000.00 to further the mission. They are talking about the same donor, so why do they come up with different gift suggestions? Similar, to the color of the dress, the Prospect Development professional and the Development Officer have different perceptions.
The common perception differences between Prospect Development Professionals and Development Officers led a team of Prospect Development Professionals in Ohio to conduct a survey to look deeper into these different perceptions. The individuals who conducted this survey were connected through a common Prospect Development group called OPRN (Ohio Prospect Research Network). The survey was led by Sarah Richards from The Dynamic Catholic Institute, Jane Owsley from The University of Cincinnati Foundation, Kimberly Rodstrom from Kent State University with special thanks to Becky Fullmer from the University of Cincinnati Foundation. These four women came from various different organizations and backgrounds which helped to look at the survey and the data from various viewpoints.
145 people participated in the survey. 71% of respondents were Prospect Development Professionals and 29% were Development Officers. Overall, respondents were most likely to be female prospect development professionals having been in their career 10+ years and working for urban organizations in higher education located in Ohio. However, overall respondents still had a good varied background of individuals, locations and organizations represented.
Overall both Development Officers and Prospect Development Professionals said that prior giving was the most important factor considered when deciding the size of a gift to ask a donor to make. Followed by affinity to the organization and then hard assets. However, the order of those three factors varied when broken down by organization type, male vs. female and Development Officers vs. Prospect Development Professionals.
But everyone is different in the way they view different factors in determining a donor’s ask amount. Thus, it is still helpful for Prospect Development Professionals to know what indicators are most important to a Development Officer so they can provide leverage when Prospect Development Professionals share information about a prospect. For example, if a particular Development Officer values and rates a prospect higher based on hard assets, highlight a prospect's hard assets in the meeting.
In the survey, communication style and preferences were also evaluated. For both Development Officers and Prospect Development Professionals, in-person strategy sessions were the most preferred way to share information when determining a prospect ask amount. However, when looking at the second prefered style of communication, Development Officer’s preferred email and Prospect Development Professionals prefer notes in the database. Looking at the different ways both perform their jobs, this makes sense. Development Officers are often on the road meeting with donors and it is easier for them to communicate by email. Similarly, Prospect Development Professionals spend most of their time in the database.
Overall, affinity to an organization, especially prior giving, was the leading factor considered when determining the ask amount, above identified capacity. But everyone is different and it is important to highlight the factors that are valued most by the specific individual. Additionally, in-person strategy sessions were the most preferred way to share information when determining a prospect ask amount. But if those cannot take place, Development Officers prefer to receive information by email and Prospect Development Professionals prefer to share information by entering it in the database. The insight found through this survey is interesting but it is important to open a conversation in your office to determine what factors and communication styles works best for the individuals on your team because black and blue or white and gold it is still a beautiful dress.
We know intrinsically that the work we do has a high value for our organizations. We know the work we do is indispensable for a healthy fundraising program. We know that without our impact, our organizations would raise a fraction of what they currently raise. Understanding and expressing that value has for a long time been hard to pin down and express in a way that elevates. Until now. Precision Prospect Development shows us the way. It translates our work into value and in a language the senior leadership can understand and lays out strategies and tactics to help you achieve maximum success.
This inability to articulate our value in the language of senior leadership has been a major roadblock for our profession. It is one of the leading reasons why there is such little representation of Prospect Development folks at the senior leadership table. If you run some basic searches on LinkedIn or Google, you will find that there are only a handful of folks at the AVP or VP level in our field. If you run the same search for every other department in a development shop, be it annual giving, planned giving, major giving, corporate giving, foundation giving, principal giving, you will find that the complete opposite is true. For practically every organization that has a mature or large development shop with at least 30 employees, there will exist an AVP and/or VP in each of these areas.
This doesn’t sit well with me. This has to change. Why are we so underrepresented at the table? Why do we need to have the occasional champion on the front-lines write articles on their blog or on LinkedIn, cheerleading our value proposition to their peers as if our value proposition needs defending, as if it is not widely accepted amongst all organizations that Prospect Development is an essential piece of the development puzzle, and that to muzzle us by not giving us a seat at the table is detrimental to an organization’s health? An understanding of The Why can help us to quickly correct this travesty so that future generations of Prospect Development folks will be amazed to learn that their pioneering predecessors ever had anything but the seat of honor at the leadership table.
We need to change our categorization in the hierarchy of development from cost center to revenue generator.
Prospect Development is a revenue generator. We are in the relationship business. We are highly valuable to the bottom-line and our work has a direct impact on dollars in the door. Adding more boots on the ground is not always the answer when a revenue increase is sought after. Increasing your prospect development staff so that you have healthy balance of researcher to field officer is vital to the success of our organizations.
We are in a unique position in our organizations in that we interact with all units. We are like a central hub connected to every program. We have the ability to influence and impact beyond any other unit in our organizations. We must harness this power with a focus on the bottom-line as much as possible. If we think of ourselves as fundraisers and operate our programs in accordance with this focus, the sky is the limit on what we can achieve.
I hope you will join us in Columbus on May 10th to learn more about how to position yourself and your department for success and how harnessing the power of data can help us to get there.
Errors and mistakes happen but are not the end of the world. Often, gift officers view researchers as data geeks. And, that’s OK, too! In their recent webinar, “Did I Do That?,” board member Beth Havens and former board president Regina Alhassan teamed up to explore owning your space as the team's data ambassador and how to turn common missteps into opportunities to improve systems and relationships.
Infused with American pop-culture, the 60-minute webinar had over 50 participants with members actively engaged, asking questions and sharing comments. Top tips include editing each other's work; letting it rest – review work with fresh eyes after 30 minutes or the next day; taking a walk to clear your mind; and using a formal request system which offers a menu of 3-5 research products. Kudos to Beth and Regina for representing our chapter in Apra’s annual Chapters Share The Knowledge Week.
“Did I Do That?” and other CSTK webinars will be available on Apra’s online store soon. Webinars are $49 for members, $79 for non-members.
Replace this text with your copyright information and address.
"Place your organization name here" is a 501(c)6 non-profit organization. Michigan , P.O. Box 1234, South Lyon, MI 123456